Privacy & Security Violations at Buy.com

In October 2000, I noticed that buy.com‘s product return system allowed any Internet user to view prepaid UPS return labels intended for use by some 45,000+ Buy.com customers. Labels included customers’ names, addresses, and phone numbers. Buy.com has since fixed the problem, replacing the information with an error message, but I kept a sample of the data that was temporarily publicly accessible. See coverage of the story in major media.

 

Participant Response Display Mechanism

Participant Response Display Mechanism in use at ICANN Candidate Forum
Participant Response Display Mechanism in use at ICANN Candidate Forum

Some questions are best asked in writing for a more direct, on-the-record, reponse and to facilitate more pointed debate. To combine these benefits of textual responses with the immediacy of a face-to-face event, I developed the “Participant Response Display Mechanism” which receives brief messages from two or more computer terminals for display on a projection screen. As each participant responds, his answer is immediately displayed for others to see, and the system avoids bias towards fast typists by giving each participant a separate area on the screen. In other configurations, messages may be queued for manual review by an instructor or assistant, may be routed to the screen in their entirety, or may be selected randomly. With flexibility in the configuration of screen areas, this system can be used to facilitate a textual “debate” (whether genuine or role-play), and with queuing systems to share space among a larger group, the system can facilitate a written meta-discussion among all participants even as primary discussion continues orally.

This system was used at the ICANN Candidate Forum in Cambridge, MA in October 2000.

Details in Berkman Center Meeting Tools.

Expert Declarations in National Football League, et al., v. TVRADIONOW Corporation (iCraveTV)

I had the honor of submitting testimony, both in two expert declarations and orally, in National Football League, et al., v. TVRADIONOW Corporation (iCraveTV), litigation in federal court as to the propriety of iCraveTV’s retransmission of certain American television video to users nationwide and worldwide. My initial expert declaration and supplemental expert declaration.