My expert memorandum Shortcomings and Challenges in the Restriction of Internet Retransmissions of Over-the-Air Television Content to Canadian Internet Users was attached to the National Association of Broadcasters’ submission to Industry Canada in its 2001 evaluation of retransmission of commercial television content over the Internet.
ICANN Public Meeting Notes and Webcast – Montevideo, Uruguay – September 7-10, 2001
I have completed the webcast and scribe’s notes of the ICANN public meeting held in Montevideo, Uruguay on September 7-10, 2001. Archives.
ICANN Public Meeting Notes and Webcast – Stockholm, Sweden – June 1-4, 2001
I have completed the webcast and scribe’s notes of the ICANN public meeting held in Stockholm, Sweden on June 1-4, 2001. Archives.
Analysis of Registrations in the ARNI .BIZ Top-Level Domain
Analysis of Registrations in the IOD .WEB Top-Level Domain
ICANN Public Meeting Notes and Webcast – Melbourne, Australia – March 10-13, 2001
I have completed the webcast and scribe’s notes of the ICANN public meeting held in Melbourne, Australia on March 10-13, 2001. Archives.
ICANN Public Meeting Notes and Webcast – Los Angeles, California – November 13-16, 2000
I have completed the webcast and scribe’s notes of the ICANN public meeting held in Los Angeles, California on November 13-16, 2000. Archives.
Pressing Issues II: Understanding and Critiquing ICANN’s Policy Agenda
Pressing Issues II: Understanding and Critiquing ICANN’s Policy Agenda (November 2000) (co-author and co-editor of conference briefing book, joint with Rebecca Nesson and Diane Cabell)
Privacy & Security Violations at Buy.com
In October 2000, I noticed that buy.com‘s product return system allowed any Internet user to view prepaid UPS return labels intended for use by some 45,000+ Buy.com customers. Labels included customers’ names, addresses, and phone numbers. Buy.com has since fixed the problem, replacing the information with an error message, but I kept a sample of the data that was temporarily publicly accessible. See coverage of the story in major media.
Participant Response Display Mechanism
Some questions are best asked in writing for a more direct, on-the-record, reponse and to facilitate more pointed debate. To combine these benefits of textual responses with the immediacy of a face-to-face event, I developed the “Participant Response Display Mechanism” which receives brief messages from two or more computer terminals for display on a projection screen. As each participant responds, his answer is immediately displayed for others to see, and the system avoids bias towards fast typists by giving each participant a separate area on the screen. In other configurations, messages may be queued for manual review by an instructor or assistant, may be routed to the screen in their entirety, or may be selected randomly. With flexibility in the configuration of screen areas, this system can be used to facilitate a textual “debate” (whether genuine or role-play), and with queuing systems to share space among a larger group, the system can facilitate a written meta-discussion among all participants even as primary discussion continues orally.
This system was used at the ICANN Candidate Forum in Cambridge, MA in October 2000.
Details in Berkman Center Meeting Tools.